Anyone who has been involved in instructional design for any length of time will very quickly run into that workplace reality called Rapid Development tools. Often, the most common complaint from the tools team is that the instructional design team wants the tools team to develop the eLearning equivalent of rocket science. While the designers complain that the tools team is forever forcing them to put a lid on creativity and making them think of limitations before they even begin to design anything innovative. And so the tug of war continues, and the course gets pulled in various directions.
Here are a few questions you can ask yourself to avoid falling into the ‘tools trap’.
What is the starting point of the discussion – the development tool or the design of the learning?
I’m convinced that even the most creative course designer can develop tunnel vision if the starting point for the discussion is the tool rather than the design of the learning experience. Sure your customer might have a strong preference for a given tool. But in their best interests, you need to drill down to identify what they really want (they actually don’t care which tool you use, as long as it gives them the desired interactivity/functionality) and then recommend which tool best serves the purpose.
Does your developed course give away the tool used?
That’s pretty much the acid test. Can other instructional designers or courseware developers predict the tool used for development just by looking at the finished output or course? If the answer to that is yes, I’m guessing it’s time to get out of the tools framework and get the design element back into your eLearning course.
Are you letting the choice of a storyboarding tool drive the selection of the development tool?
Here’s a not-so-surprising fact – if your source content is in PowerPoint format and if you are not on your guard, you will most likely end up thinking of PowerPoint conversions – and settle for tools that allow you to do just that. And then before you know it, you end up doing what you swore you’d never do- create page turners. If the only difference between your PowerPoint file and your course is the navigation buttons, you clearly haven’t looked much beyond the storyboarding tool.
Are there possibilities for mix and match?
One way of getting around the limitations of a certain tool is to mix and match various outputs from a selection of tools. We’ve often enhanced our courses by creating custom pieces in Flash and using them in courses developed with regular rapid authoring tools such as Lectora, Articulate, and Captivate.
Are you thinking of modifying templates and tweaking styles?
Templates may be a good starting point for most tools. But what next? Customers may be quite happy if you go with existing pre-built pages and styles. But if your aim is customer delight and not just meeting the customer’s expectations, you might want to go an extra mile or two to give them a couple of customized options for styles and templates. The results will be worth it.
Is a little tool-sensitivity in order?
While we as instructional designers cannot allow ourselves to be boxed in by the limitations of a tool, I think a healthy appreciation of a tool’s limitations and the time that goes into creating workarounds can help us crystallize our own design ideas better. When we are hard pressed for time, we will sometimes have to go with the best that any tool can offer out-of-the-box.
To conclude, though tools do play a critical role in course development, eLearning is more about design and less about tools. What do you think?
Subscribe to Our eLearning Development Blogs
Get CommLab's latest eLearning articles straight to your inbox. Enter your email address below:
Using videos in eLearning courses not only keeps learners engaged, but also enables them to remember the content easily.Many industry experts recommend using videos in online courses to enhance their effectiveness. However, we face aproblem when we use videos directly in our courses’ slides.
According to a survey conducted by the eLearning guild in 2013, Articulate Storyline is one of the most preferred eLearning course authoring tools. This is because it is easy to use and comes with many in-built interactivities. Storyline can be used to publish courses to HTML5 and the iPad. Furthermore, this rapid authoring tool’s interface is very similar to PowerPoint, and anyone who is familiar with the application from Microsoft can use this software easily.
Training is an ongoing process and goes a long way in improving the skills of the workforce, resulting in increased productivity.
According to the State of the Industry Report, organizations spent $1,208 per employee in 2013, on an average, and this figure is very likely to increase. This means that companies are willing to invest heavily in training and development activities. Hence, it is important that they get the best ROI on training.
Have you ever tried to create your own radio buttons with different objects in Articulate Storyline? Or, have you at least tried to convert the objects you have on the slide to buttons or radio buttons? It’s very simple. The Button Set feature of Articulate Storyline makes it possible. The one feature of Articulate Storyline that has not hogged the limelight is the Button Set. But, this is as helpful as the other features this incredible rapid authoring tool.
According to “Key work Health and Safety Statistics Australia”, in 2011-12, 1,28,050 claims were filed for compensation for work related injuries or illness, which equates to 12.2 serious claims per 1000 employees. Many accidents at the workplace can be prevented by using personal protective equipment.
A consultant is an expert who is proficient in certain areas. As an eLearning consultant, you need to have business experience and operational experience. You need to be curious about how things work and educate yourself about the overall process of the eLearning. Also, you need to clearly communicate your ideas to the client and be able to provide creative solutions to any problem that may arise during the execution of a project. Here are 5 things that successful eLearning consultants do.
Articulate Storyline’s default features enable eLearning developers to create an eLearning course in quick time. The Final Quiz is an important part of an online course and used to test the learner. The score of the learner will be displayed by default.
In online courses, learners will be able to navigate the course with the help of mouse. What if the learner wants to navigate with the help of a keyboard? Can we develop a course which allows him to do that? Yes, we can. Let us see how to create such a course in Articulate Storyline.
In an earlier blog titled E-learning to Cater to Varying Digital Literacy Levels of Employees – Why?, I talked about why employees need to be divided based on their digital literacy and assign online courses accordingly. I had borrowed the suggestion from Ray Wang, founder and chairman of Constellation Research. In this blog, I will attempt to explore various eLearning design options that best cater to the needs of employees with varying digital literacy levels.E-learning courses involve engagement with the course interface, but the degree of engagement varies based on the way the course is designed. For a digitally savvy employees, complex interactivities and game elements may be incorporated. However, for digital novices, minimal interactivities and easy navigation elements are required.