Successful organizations have well-planned Instructor Led Training (ILT) solutions in place. Many of these organizations, are now increasingly becoming aware of the value of eLearning, and have shifted part of their training solutions online. Can they afford to shift all their training solutions online? Before attempting to answer this question, it would be best to take a quick look at some of the limitations of one delivery format and how other options can be used to overcome them.
|Instructor-Led Training Limitations||Blended Solution|
|1||ILTs are typically, not available on-demand, or closer to the moment of need. Think of the many times you needed immediate training, but had to wait till the training schedule allowed you to register for a classroom session.||The concepts and key takeaways from classroom training can be made into short eLearning modules, which can be accessed in time of need. For example, troubleshooting tips for service engineers, or Product assembling guidelines for sales and service personnel. Employees can access them any time, particularly when they need the information the most. After all, it is not possible to retain all that is taught in classroom session forever!|
|2||Schedules for ILT programs are typically rigid and fixed in advance. If your workforce works in shifts, this type of training can be very inconvenient for night shift workers. For some reason, if learners are unable to attend a session, rescheduling classes is not possible most times, with inflexible schedules or classes filled beyond capacity.||When employees need to be trained in a classroom environment, the content can be converted into eLearning so that those who are unable to attend the classroom session, are benefited from the online resource. It also serves as reinforcement learning, to those who wish to brush up the knowledge gained in classroom training.|
|3||ILTs can have inconsistency in the message and delivery, and learners can sometimes be at the mercy of poor instructors.||Converting the course into eLearning ensures that the same content is accessed by employees, across the organization, irrespective of their location. This ensures quality and consistency of knowledge transfer, ensuring no one is at a disadvantage.|
However, not all courses may be suitable for eLearning format. Let’s look at some of the limitations of eLearning format and how ILT and complement it.
|E-learning Limitations||Blended Solution|
|1||E-learning may not be an effective medium, when you need to train employees on soft skills, such as leadership skills. A standard training is delivered through eLearning and cannot be altered impromptu, depending on the responses or interests of the learners. It may not appeal to all types of learners, particularly to learners who have limited computer skills.||In cases such as soft skills, training can be held in classrooms, but reference materials or job aids, videos and case studies can be made available online, as supporting learning documents. Alternatively, these reference materials, especially case studies can be given as a pre-classroom exercise, which can be an excellent interactive discussion point during classroom interactions. E-learning can be used for pre-classroom activities, in case of training delivered through ILT method.|
|2||Trainings such as product training may require hands-on training, which may not be possible through eLearning.||In cases where the participants need to have hands-on training, ILT is the best option. It can be followed up with online assessments. Videos or product demonstrations can be uploaded as a part of short bite-sized learning modules, which can be accessed for just-in-time purposes.|
As you can see, no single format is suitable to address all your training requirements. Therefore, coming back to the earlier question, it may not be recommended that organizations to move all their training solutions online. Adding variety in the delivery format, through blended training solutions, can make your training programs less monotonous.
Blending classroom training and eLearning, engages learners and brings variety to the training program. It also caters to individuals, who have different learning styles and preferences. Moreover, learning becomes a process and not an event, which I think best summarizes why organizations should opt for a blended solution.
Subscribe to Our eLearning Design Blogs
Get CommLab's latest eLearning articles straight to your inbox. Enter your email address below:
According to recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 48 million people (1 in 6 Americans) get sick, 128,000 are hospitalized and 3,000 die each year from foodborne diseases. In order to adhere to food safety regulations, one of our clients came up with a requirement for an e-learning course.
E-learning and m-learning are powerful learning methods; both are dynamic and effective ways to teach people. So then, what are the differences between and e-learning and m-learning methods?
E-learning involves a series of modules with in-depth subject-matter while m-learning involves smaller chunks of information which can be accessed anywhere, anytime. Modules are designed differently, depending on the kind of format used to learn. M-learning breaks the barriers of time and place and provides easy access to courses. E-learning also enables learners to access information anytime, anywhere through a laptop, and a stable environment is needed for the learner to take training.
As a college student, I had an opportunity to read Wings of Fire, the autobiography of the former Indian president, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam. The story of the “missile man” who rose to great heights from humble beginnings is truly inspiring.
The sudden demise of this eminent scientist is a great loss to the country and has saddened millions. The life of Dr. Kalam is a testimony to the fact that determination and hard work can overcome the shackles of financial and other constraints.
There were a few letters marked “Never sent. Never signed” that were discovered in Abraham Lincoln’s desk after his death. When he was upset with someone he would write a letter expressing his anger but would refrain from sending it to the intended person. This practice allowed him to vent his anger, yet not allow needless or unpleasant consequences. One of the famous unsent letters was to Gen. George G Meade, who was blamed for letting Robert E Lee escape after Gettysburg. Unfortunately, in today’s age of social media, people have “lost the art of the unsent angry letter” – an expression used in a NY times article by Maria Konnikova.
It is common knowledge that good assessments play a key role in the making of an effective online course. They not only help evaluate the learner’s comprehension of the subject-matter, but also reinforce the learning effectively.
We all know the e-learning industry is full of acronyms. Even the word e-learning itself is the shorthand for electronic learning. As an e-learning professional, it is important to be familiar with various acronyms used in the field of e-learning. Here, I would like to share some acronyms that are commonly used in e-learning.
E-learning is increasingly used by organizations as online courses are effective, affordable and can be accessed anytime, anywhere. But, many organizations are not able to realize these benefits offered by the online training medium due to a serious problem – high dropout rates.
Day-by-day, the demand for rapid e-learning is increasing, and so, everyone is using rapid authoring tools to develop online courses. There are many authoring tools available in the market but a few became very popular. Most of our customers and prospects prefer Articulate Storyline to other rapid authoring tools such as Captivate and Lectora. Developing courses in Storyline is very easy, and the tool offers a lot of flexibility to customize the features or look and feel of the online course.
When it comes to mobile learning, HTML5 with responsive design is required to provide the best learning experience on mobiles, especially on smart-phones with small screens. Courses developed in Storyline and Lectora work fine on mobile devices such as iPads and other tablets, but it is difficult to view them in smart-phones. Captivate has a responsive design feature. So, we must choose it if we need to develop courses for all mobile devices. Captivate is not very intuitive and flexible to develop customized features. We can also build mobile- compatible courses using manual coding but it is time-consuming and expensive.
Recently, I read the E-learning Guild report “Authoring Tool for Mobile Design” and in it, I saw the great news for which I was waiting for a while. I thought I should share it with you all. The developers of Articulate Storyline, Lectora Inspire, Lectora Online and other authoring tools are in the process of adding responsive design feature by the end of 2015.
Here is some information from the E-learning Guild report “Authoring Tool for Mobile Design”.
|Scales to multiple screen sizes||Yes||Yes||Yes|
|Responsive design features||Coming by end of 2015||Yes||Coming by end of 2015|
2016 will be a watershed year for mobile learning as all courses may be made compatible to all mobile devices. Storyline may become the first choice to develop e-learning or m-learning courses because of its intuitiveness. This may force all learning management systems to be compatible with mobile devices. MOODLE is ahead in this regard, and it has a responsive design feature and works on all the mobile devices.
Hope you find this post useful. Do share your views.
Despite today’s technology and a connected world, classroom training is still an effective method to impart training to all employees. But, instructor-led teaching may not be appropriate for all training needs. Suppose there is a requirement for an organisation to train its employees spread across the globe, on a particular product, in a month’s time, classroom training will not serve the purpose. Here, e-learning serves as a good option to train employees, at comparatively lower costs, within a given schedule. Due to improvements in reliability and speed, converting classroom training materials into online courses has become a justified and cost-effective opportunity.