In today’s organization, a great deal of time is spent in conducting meetings for various purposes. Some are meant for communicative purposes while others involve some type of joint decision making. The decisions that are made on a routine basis may be simple or complex. But it involves assimilating a huge amount of information, scrutinizing them well and exploring the various ideas that generate from it. Decisions taken can have an effect on the overall performance of the team.
What are the various methods by which decisions are made in an organization? The approaches vary depending on various factors like type of decision, time and resources available, nature of the task and so on. Johnson. D.W and Johnson F.P (2000) in their book “Joining together: Group theory and group skills” describe the following methods of decision making.
1. Decision made by authority without group discussion
This type of decisions is generally taken by the designated leader without involving the team members. It involves simple or routine task, having little or no time available at disposal. In this type of decision making, the team commitment required is low. It ranks high on assertive scale but low on co-operative scale as no group interaction is allowed.
2. Decision made by authority after group discussion
The team comes up with various ideas, has discussions but the final decision is taken by the leader itself. This type of decision comes handy when the available time allows for team discussion not agreement, little team commitment is required. Listening to the team helps the authority to take better decision.
3. Decision made by expert
It is useful when one person of the team has an overwhelming expertise on a specific subject matter. The expert is selected from amongst the group members and he is given the responsibility to consider the issues. The results of these decisions are highly dependent on the expert’s knowledge on the matter. There are little chances of group discussion and team commitment is also low in this case.
4. Decision made by averaging the individuals’ opinion
In this method of decision making, individuals are called separately and ask his/ her opinion on the matter. After allowing the team members to voice their opinions, a consolidated decision based on the opinions of the members is prepared. Though this seems logical as there will not be any team commitment with respect to the decision made as the decision has not be voiced out as a group. It may not be as effective as it was intended to be.
5. Decision by minority
Minority includes less than 50% of team member who makes the decision. This method is generally used for taking large number of decisions in a limited time period. But it has some drawbacks as this process may lead to railroading or may create an air of competitive atmosphere with the team members.
6. Decision by majority vote
The most commonly used decision making process and it involves more than 51% of the team members. It is generally important for making decision when there is insufficient time to make decision by consensus. The group supports the voting process and its outcome and would be considerably committed to implement the outcome.
7. Decision by consensus
The most effective method of all the decision making process. In this method all the team members get the chance to express their thoughts and feelings. A collective decision is made through a communication process with all the group members speaking and expressing their ideas. The team commitment required to implement the decision is sufficiently high.
While there are several methods that one can adopt to take decisions, the most common method is the consensus method wherein all the members involved jointly come to a common understanding and take a collective decision. However, depending on the situations other methods can be considered.
Subscribe to Our eLearning Design Blogs
Get CommLab's latest eLearning articles straight to your inbox. Enter your email address below:
In my previous blog, Checklist for content standardization in eLearning- Part 1, I have discussed the grammatical rules that every instructional designer (ID) should follow while developing a storyboard. In this blog, I would like to share some guidelines on sentence structuring, style and important elements of an online course.
Gen-Y people or millennials are those who are born between 1976 and 1998. They have grown up with technology, and their attention span is 2 minutes or less. They prefer learning through digital media to books.
One of the adult learning principles states that adult learners don’t like to be directed, but wish to explore and acquire knowledge themselves. In an eLearning course, the main purpose of the Graphical User Interface (GUI) is to enable learners to navigate seamlessly and tell them ‘where they are’ in the course, how many slides they have completed, how many more do they need to complete and so on. The GUI of a typical online training course contains buttons such as Play, Pause, Replay, Previous, and Next. It also has the progress bar and a menu which contains options to turn the audio on/off, seek help online, access the glossary and resources and exit the eLearning course. Depending upon our requirements, we can skip or add some of the elements described above.
People expect to be bored by eLearning – let’s show them it doesn’t have to be like that!”
– Cammy Bean
The ultimate challenge that every eLearning course designer faces is engaging the adult learner in the online learning environment. To overcome this challenge, they need to have a clear idea of the strategy they are going to use.
Effective audio narration goes a long way in enhancing the efficacy of an eLearning course by reducing the cognitive load. The modality principle states that the learner can learn better from animations and narration than just animations and on-screen text.
Designing the prototype of an eLearning course and getting it approved before developing the course plays a key role in the smooth execution of the online course development project. Having a prototype allows the client and the developer to be on the same page, and this helps reduce rework in the later stages of the project.
Numerous classroom training sessions over the years would have resulted in you accumulating a vast knowledge bank on various topics in your organization. The material could be in the form of PowerPoint presentations, MS-Word documents, or PDF files – all reviewed, finalized and signed off by your Subject-matter Experts (SMEs).
Welcome to today’s blog post. Aviation industry is one of the first industries to adapt eLearning and define clear standards for the development of CBTs (AICC). Having worked on several projects for the industry, I have understood the significance of these standards. Developing an eLearning program for the aviation industry is different from any other industry and requires great attention to details. Today, we will look at the three parameters that will help ensure the safe landing of your aviation CBTs.
The online training medium is used extensively to train the workforce in the healthcare sector. According to a report from Ambient Insight, the revenue of the U.S. corporate market for eLearning products and services is expected to reach $7.1 billion by 2015, out of which, the growth rate of the healthcare vertical will be a staggering 45.1%.
What we learn with pleasure we never forget. – Alfred Mercier
It is common knowledge that a good online course makes the learner stay focused throughout the course. To impart first-rate training, as an instructional designer, you can add humor to your eLearning course. Proper use of fun elements goes a long way in making your eLearning course engaging. Characters, cartoons, avatars, photographs, animated pictures, case-studies, animations and scenarios can be used to make courses fun-filled. In this blog, I would like to share some tips to use humor very effectively in your online training course without compromising on the course objectives.