Return on investment (ROI), as far as this financial concept is concerned, is the difference between the gain which we get from the investment less the cost of the investment, which means the net gains divided by the cost of investment. Let us go to the method of calculation of the ROI, as far as training is concerned.
Calculating the return on investment for training involves four steps:
Collect Information – Gains and Costs
The first step concerns collecting information on the benefits gained and the costs incurred. Now, calculating the costs of a training program is pretty simple and straight forward, which we had discussed in the earlier blog post.
“Isolate” the results of training
The next step is to isolate the benefits which you get from training from the benefits you get from some other inputs. This means you have to put a percentage on training’s contribution. This can be a challenging step. It is not as simple as straightaway apportioning the benefits of the training to results.
Now, the best way to do this it to use a “CONTROL” group and a “TEST “group. The CONTROL” group is not put through training but the TEST group is. ALL other factors are kept constant. Whatever results accrue from the training group or the experimental group can be directly attributable to training.
The question then arises: How far is it practical to have control groups and explanatory groups in an organizational context?
Well, in a research organization or in a laboratory, this is how it is done and you will get pretty valid results when you have a control group. But as far as we are concerned, in a dynamic organizational context I don’t think it is practical to have a control group for each and every training program unless the program is of pretty high visibility and high investment. Then, it makes sense to do such an evaluation and isolation. We would like to do this especially when we want to scale it up across the organization and you would like to first see the pilot and the kind of results you get out of it.
In case you are not able to use the control group and the explanatory group method, you must measure the impact based on the estimates given by the participant supervisors, managers and the experts through questionnaires.
The questionnaire will ask them what they think is the percentage of contribution of training in the result they achieve? For example, if there is an increase in Sales, we ask the supervisors what they think the percentage of increase in sales is and whether they attribute it to the training which the sales people have undergone.
Likewise, we ask senior managers, participants and so-called industry experts or internal experts. You’ll immediately realize that there is a fair degree of subjectivity in this kind of estimate. Somebody may say its 25%, or 50% or even 60%, so it’s anybody’s assessment of how much that kind of impact is worth. So, isolating the results of training, as you can see, is not simple.
Put money value on gains
Once that is done, being able to monetize gains is pretty simple and straightforward because your finance and accounts will be able to give you the monetary value on the gains.
And then it is a straightforward application of the formula of ROI. So, you just take the gains subtracted from the investment you made or the cost and divided by the cost of investment to get the percentage. This is your Return on Investment.
Subscribe to Our Blogs
Get CommLab's latest eLearning articles straight to your inbox. Enter your email address below:
Effective performance management is the mantra to success in today’s highly competitive business environment. A well-designed performance management process involves various steps such as setting goals, spotting performance gaps, coaching, discussing improvements and rewarding personnel for their contribution.
“The most important principle for designing lively e-learning is to see e-learning design not as information design but as designing an experience.” – Cathy Moore
“Oh no!”, “Why do I need to take this online course?” – these are some of the common reactions from learners when they are asked to take courses on dry topics such as regulatory norms. As instructional designers, we are often tasked with creating e-learning courses on subjects that most learners consider boring.
In any eLearning course, we are so caught up with creating content and visuals that we tend to neglect a vital aspect of any eLearning course, which is the Graphic User Interface, popularly known as the GUI. It is a well-known fact that the GUI can have a make or break effect on your e-learning course.
A trailer is an advertisement of a new movie; its purpose is to kindle eagerness among people to watch the movie and enjoy the story. The main objective of a trailer is to increase the interest levels within us. On viewing a trailer, we become so enthusiastic and sometimes even restless to know the hidden obscurities and mysteries and the real story, which is yet to come. The same simile can be applied in the case of e-learning too.
The manufacturing industry is one of the most important sectors of the US economy. According to a report released by the Economic Policy Institute, this sector contributed about $2.1 trillion (12.5 percent of total U.S. gross domestic product) in 2013. The report also stated that manufacturing companies employ about 12 million people or 8.8% of the total American workforce. Developments in this industry act as catalysts to the growth of the economy, and training plays a vital role in enhancing the operational efficiency of firms in this sector.
It is common knowledge that L&D managers are under constant pressure to deliver the best and make the optimal use of the training dollar. With e-learning occupying the center stage of corporate training strategies, it has become imperative to develop high quality online courses, in quick time, within budget.
It is a well-known fact that sales personnel face many problems while promoting their products in the market andwhile trying to survive in this competitive world.What are the reasons behind these challenges and how can they beovercome? Ineffective and tiresome trainings are to a great extent responsible for this outcome. These problems can be eliminated by providing an effective and captivating learning experience.
There are three major challenges that the retail industry faces. They are(1) giving the highest service quality to the customer, (2) retaining the existing client, and (3) promoting the brand awareness about new products. All these challenges are related to the customer or the client. Now, when it comes to its employees, the retail industry again has an uphill task of retaining its own employees, making them more knowledgeable and providing updateson the latest products and services, and giving them the requisite access to information, so that they can use it when they need it the most.
It is common knowledge that well-trained employees are the crux of a successful organization. Companies need to ensure that their staff members have the required knowledge and skills, to survive in a dynamic world of business.
Effective training plays a critical role in the success of a medical representative. So, pharmaceutical firms spend huge amounts of money on training their sales personnel. According to Merck Capital Ventures, drug manufacturers worldwide spend about a billion dollars an year on training their salespeople.