Return on investment (ROI), as far as this financial concept is concerned, is the difference between the gain which we get from the investment less the cost of the investment, which means the net gains divided by the cost of investment. Let us go to the method of calculation of the ROI, as far as training is concerned.
Calculating the return on investment for training involves four steps:
Collect Information – Gains and Costs
The first step concerns collecting information on the benefits gained and the costs incurred. Now, calculating the costs of a training program is pretty simple and straight forward, which we had discussed in the earlier blog post.
“Isolate” the results of training
The next step is to isolate the benefits which you get from training from the benefits you get from some other inputs. This means you have to put a percentage on training’s contribution. This can be a challenging step. It is not as simple as straightaway apportioning the benefits of the training to results.
Now, the best way to do this it to use a “CONTROL” group and a “TEST “group. The CONTROL” group is not put through training but the TEST group is. ALL other factors are kept constant. Whatever results accrue from the training group or the experimental group can be directly attributable to training.
The question then arises: How far is it practical to have control groups and explanatory groups in an organizational context?
Well, in a research organization or in a laboratory, this is how it is done and you will get pretty valid results when you have a control group. But as far as we are concerned, in a dynamic organizational context I don’t think it is practical to have a control group for each and every training program unless the program is of pretty high visibility and high investment. Then, it makes sense to do such an evaluation and isolation. We would like to do this especially when we want to scale it up across the organization and you would like to first see the pilot and the kind of results you get out of it.
In case you are not able to use the control group and the explanatory group method, you must measure the impact based on the estimates given by the participant supervisors, managers and the experts through questionnaires.
The questionnaire will ask them what they think is the percentage of contribution of training in the result they achieve? For example, if there is an increase in Sales, we ask the supervisors what they think the percentage of increase in sales is and whether they attribute it to the training which the sales people have undergone.
Likewise, we ask senior managers, participants and so-called industry experts or internal experts. You’ll immediately realize that there is a fair degree of subjectivity in this kind of estimate. Somebody may say its 25%, or 50% or even 60%, so it’s anybody’s assessment of how much that kind of impact is worth. So, isolating the results of training, as you can see, is not simple.
Put money value on gains
Once that is done, being able to monetize gains is pretty simple and straightforward because your finance and accounts will be able to give you the monetary value on the gains.
And then it is a straightforward application of the formula of ROI. So, you just take the gains subtracted from the investment you made or the cost and divided by the cost of investment to get the percentage. This is your Return on Investment.
Subscribe to Our eLearning Design Blogs
Get CommLab's latest eLearning articles straight to your inbox. Enter your email address below:
Designing the prototype of an eLearning course and getting it approved before developing the course plays a key role in the smooth execution of the online course development project. Having a prototype allows the client and the developer to be on the same page, and this helps reduce rework in the later stages of the project.
Numerous classroom training sessions over the years would have resulted in you accumulating a vast knowledge bank on various topics in your organization. The material could be in the form of PowerPoint presentations, MS-Word documents, or PDF files – all reviewed, finalized and signed off by your Subject-matter Experts (SMEs).
Welcome to today’s blog post. Aviation industry is one of the first industries to adapt eLearning and define clear standards for the development of CBTs (AICC). Having worked on several projects for the industry, I have understood the significance of these standards. Developing an eLearning program for the aviation industry is different from any other industry and requires great attention to details. Today, we will look at the three parameters that will help ensure the safe landing of your aviation CBTs.
The online training medium is used extensively to train the workforce in the healthcare sector. According to a report from Ambient Insight, the revenue of the U.S. corporate market for eLearning products and services is expected to reach $7.1 billion by 2015, out of which, the growth rate of the healthcare vertical will be a staggering 45.1%.
What we learn with pleasure we never forget. – Alfred Mercier
It is common knowledge that a good online course makes the learner stay focused throughout the course. To impart first-rate training, as an instructional designer, you can add humor to your eLearning course. Proper use of fun elements goes a long way in making your eLearning course engaging. Characters, cartoons, avatars, photographs, animated pictures, case-studies, animations and scenarios can be used to make courses fun-filled. In this blog, I would like to share some tips to use humor very effectively in your online training course without compromising on the course objectives.
It is a tough task to connect with your online learners. In an eLearning course, the instructors don’t have an opportunity to communicate with the learners directly. So, it is very essential to design the course in such a way that it facilitates effective communication with the learners.
Text-heavy eLearning courses are not very effective because the cognitive load on the learner is high. So, it is important to divide the content into “digestible” chunks to facilitate effective learning.
According to Ambient Insight, the market for self-paced eLearning will reach a staggering $53 billion, by 2018, registering a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.4% between the years 2013 and 2018.
As eLearning designers, we try to make the content meaningful and learner-friendly. In this process, we sometimes forget to add some elements that help engage learners. What are these elements, and how can you involve the learner intellectually, emotionally and physically? In this post, we will find out answers to these questions.
As we know, learning objectives play a vital role in an eLearning course as they create interest in learners by sharing what they will be able to accomplishafter completing the course.